Komal Khanna

Profile description

If you have been detained under the NDPS Act without a charge sheet, you may be able to challenge the preventive detention order through a writ petition. Komal Khanna specializes in filing such petitions before both the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh and the Supreme Court of India, aiming to protect individual liberty while the investigation continues.

Komal Khanna earned a law degree from Guru Nanak Dev University and completed a specialization in constitutional law at the Indian Law Institute. Over eleven years of practice, the lawyer has focused on preventive detention matters, representing clients whose liberty has been restricted pending further inquiry. This experience includes drafting writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Punjab and Haryana High Court and invoking Article 32 before the Supreme Court of India when higher relief is required.

When a client approaches the lawyer, the first step is a careful examination of the detention order. Komal Khanna regularly assists clients in identifying procedural flaws—such as lack of an advisory board, insufficient grounds for detention, or failure to adhere to the statutory time limits. By highlighting these deficiencies, the lawyer constructs a petition that asks the court to quash the detention and order immediate release.

The lawyer’s approach to preventive detention writs is both strategic and compassionate. The petition is crafted to demonstrate that the detention is arbitrary, that the client poses no threat to public order, and that the state has not complied with the constitutional safeguards designed to prevent misuse of power. In recent High Court filings, the lawyer successfully secured orders that directed the authorities to produce the advisory board report within the legally mandated period, leading to the client’s release.

When the matter escalates to the Supreme Court of India, Komal Khanna can file a petition for a writ of certiorari, challenging the legality of the detention at the highest level. The lawyer’s experience before the apex bench includes citing landmark judgments that protect personal liberty and require strict adherence to procedural safeguards. In several cases, the Supreme Court has issued interim relief, directing the release of detainees pending a full hearing, illustrating the effectiveness of a well‑presented writ.

Clients often express relief after the lawyer explains the complex procedural terrain in plain language. Komal Khanna outlines each stage—from the initial filing, through hearing dates, to the possible outcomes—so that clients understand what to expect. The lawyer maintains regular communication, updating clients on any developments such as interim orders or the scheduling of hearings.

The lawyer’s advocacy style is concise and forceful. In courtroom appearances, Komal Khanna presents a clear narrative that connects the facts of the case with constitutional principles, avoiding unnecessary technicalities while ensuring that the court recognises the seriousness of unlawful detention. The lawyer’s ability to reference recent Supreme Court pronouncements on preventive detention has earned praise from senior judges.

Client reviews highlight the lawyer’s tenacity. One client noted that the lawyer’s swift filing of a writ petition led to release within days, despite the detention having lasted weeks. Another client appreciated the lawyer’s willingness to take the case to the Supreme Court, resulting in a landmark judgment that reinforced protective safeguards for all detainees.

Whether the petition is filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh or escalated to the Supreme Court of India, Komal Khanna’s focused expertise on NDPS preventive detention writs provides a vital lifeline for those whose freedom has been unlawfully curtailed.

Criminal Law Practice Areas