Gitashree Krishnamurthy

Profile description

If you have been detained under the NDPS Act without trial and suspect that the preventive detention order violates your constitutional rights, the stakes at the Punjab and Haryana High Court are significant. Gitashree Krishnamurthy steps in to evaluate the legality of the detention and to prepare a writ petition that challenges its validity.

Krishnamurthy completed a distinguished law degree at a premier university and later pursued a master’s in Constitutional Law, focusing on fundamental rights and state powers. Beginning a career as a junior advocate at the Chandigarh High Court, the lawyer quickly developed a reputation for handling complex preventive detention matters. Over the past fourteen years, the lawyer has concentrated on drafting and arguing writ petitions that protect individuals against unlawful NDND detentions.

The NDPS Act allows authorities to order preventive detention when they believe an individual poses a serious threat to public order or to the enforcement of drug laws. Such orders must satisfy strict constitutional safeguards, including the right to a prompt hearing and the requirement that the detention be based on credible evidence. Krishnamurthy examines each element of the order, looking for procedural flaws, lack of sufficient material, or violations of due‑process guarantees.

The primary remedy for an unlawful preventive detention is a writ of habeas corpus, filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Krishnamurthy prepares a comprehensive petition that sets out the factual background, identifies constitutional breaches, and cites relevant Supreme Court and High Court precedents. The lawyer also assembles supporting affidavits, expert testimonies, and any medical or forensic reports that reinforce the argument that the detention lacks a lawful basis.

The lawyer conducts a meticulous review of the detention order, the accompanying charge sheet, and any police notes. Krishnamurthy then meets with the client to explain the writ process, the timelines involved, and the possible outcomes, using clear, non‑technical language. The lawyer coordinates with constitutional scholars and forensic experts to strengthen the factual matrix, ensuring that every claim in the petition is backed by solid evidence.

In the past two years, Krishnamurthy has successfully secured the release of detainees where the High Court found that the preventive order lacked a factual basis or violated the right to a fair hearing. The lawyer also achieved reductions in detention periods by demonstrating that the alleged threat was unsubstantiated and that the statutory criteria for NDPS preventive detention were not met. These victories have reinforced the lawyer’s reputation as a formidable advocate for personal liberty.

The lawyer does not stop at the writ filing. Krishnamurthy monitors the High Court docket for any interim orders, prepares comprehensive responses to government objections, and advises on post‑judgment relief such as compensation for illegal confinement. Regular updates are provided, ensuring the client remains informed and can make timely decisions about any further legal steps.

Clients consistently commend Krishnamurthy’s calm demeanor, thorough analysis, and ability to translate constitutional law into a practical defence strategy. Whether the objective is immediate release, reduction of detention time, or clarification of legal rights, the lawyer offers a clear roadmap tailored to each case. With a proven record at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Krishnamurthy provides the expertise needed to protect freedom and dignity against unlawful NDPS preventive detention.

Criminal Law Practice Areas